Marj-at-Large: News &Views
  • News & Views
    • About the Author
  • Right Now
  • My Take
    • Bright Spots >
      • Where Has All the Kindness Gone?
      • A New Day on the Way: Jan. 3, 2019
      • Blessed Are the Peacemakers
      • The Audacity of Hope
      • Issues >
        • Budget and Taxes
        • The Environment
        • Guns
        • Health Care >
          • Statistics
      • The Purity of It All: LLWS
      • The Polling Place Adventure
      • July Potpourri
      • The Unexpected Bison
    • State of the Union >
      • 12/5/18: The Best of Days, the Worst of Days
      • 7/17/18: Deals With Dictators, Episode 2
      • 5/17/18: Suffer the Children
      • 4/7/18: Never Let a Crisis Go To Waste
      • 12/6/17: The Centre Cannot Hold
    • Saving the Children and Other Living Things >
      • Saving the Elephants
    • Taxes, Broadly Speaking
    • Health Care
    • Presidential Malpractice >
      • 6/22/18: Gratuitous Brutality
    • The Political Parties >
      • 2/2/18: GOP: The Cabinet Chorus of Praise
  • Marj-inized
  • Readers Write
    • Your Turn

Big Government Misogyny

7/21/2022

0 Comments

 
Republicans like to describe themselves as conservatives with a penchant for “small” government in which medical care, social welfare, and protection of the environment are not major concerns. The less spent there, the lower the tax rate and, thus, the more contributions from moneyed constituents flow into campaign coffers. I guess it works pretty well—the campaign coffer part, that is—at least for many corporations and those individuals at the upper end of the income scale where the marginal tax rate tops out at 37%. (In 1945, it was 91%. Just sayin’.) It appears they’re getting a pretty good return on their campaign investments.
 
Apparently, however, the GOP (that’s a misnomer! there’s nothing “Grand” about it) has decided to pick and choose what constitutes the notion of “small” government. I realized this several years ago when Governor What’s-His-Name* of Virginia mandated that women in his state submit to vaginal ultrasounds before they could have what were then perfectly legal abortions. 
 
What could be more big government than that? 
 
I can’t be the first person to have realized that a woman doesn’t get pregnant all by herself. What shall we do about the other participant? Mandate a vasectomy? Why not? After all, let loose on a population so ill-prepared for life that they can’t make their own health care decisions, the miscreant could impregnate thousands!
 
However,  just to keep the system fair, perhaps we should set up a nation-wide accounting department responsible for collecting monthly payments from the sperm contributor to ensure he does his part to support the resulting child for the coming 18 years. I know; he may be married to the woman who will bear the child, but you can’t be sure this is a forever relationship, can you? And clearly, we need some way to level the playing field when it comes to feeding, clothing, and housing a child for the 18 years that parents (notice the plural) are responsible for a child’s welfare.  
 
Given all that, we’ll need to expand government even more, not only to track down and persecute those wild women, but to hold to account the other half of the equation, the guys.
 
Of course, this presupposes that those alleged “pro-lifers” care about the quality of life of that child and that mother, and I’m not sure that’s the case. Remember, some of these people now say they’d like to outlaw contraception. Contraception! What are they thinking?
 
Apparently, this is what they’re thinking… as Melinda Gates, philanthropist and author, has said, “Contraceptives are the greatest lifesaving, poverty-ending, women-empowering innovation ever created.” Uh-oh! Those dangerous women again!
 
The anti-abortionist stance is misogyny run amuck. I don’t know how the females in that camp explain themselves. There’s a “Readers Write” page for that. Please … if you’re so inclined, be my guest.

*Editor's Note: His name was Bob McDonnell

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Thoughts for Our Time

    “Conservatism discards Prescription, shrinks from Principle, disavows Progress; having rejected all respect for antiquity, it offers no redress for the present, and makes no preparation for the future.”
    ~Benjamin Disraeli

    Archives

    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017

    Categories

    All
    Candidates
    Civility Or Lack Thereof
    Civil Rights
    Congress
    Constitution
    Elections
    Guns
    Immigration
    Justice System
    Privacy Issues
    Reflections
    Reproductive Rights
    Satire
    Taxes
    The Economy
    The Political Parties
    The Press
    Trump

    RSS Feed

Copyright © 2017